<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mmmm Vacumatic!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bwh.me/blog/2010/01/20/mmmm-vacumatic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bwh.me/blog/2010/01/20/mmmm-vacumatic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:25:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Garavaglia</title>
		<link>http://bwh.me/blog/2010/01/20/mmmm-vacumatic/comment-page-1/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Garavaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwh.me/blog/?p=480#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>Nice pen. Great find. Thanks for the info on Dan Smith. Will definitely keep him in mind for future restorations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice pen. Great find. Thanks for the info on Dan Smith. Will definitely keep him in mind for future restorations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Smith</title>
		<link>http://bwh.me/blog/2010/01/20/mmmm-vacumatic/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwh.me/blog/?p=480#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>Hey, nice photos you have there. I had a great time working on that pen. It&#039;s definitely a beauty. 

The mismatched jewels are actually pretty common on these second gen pens. If it has a black section it&#039;ll most likely have a black blind cap jewel. The first gen pens with the section made from celluloid should have matching jewels. 

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, nice photos you have there. I had a great time working on that pen. It&#8217;s definitely a beauty. </p>
<p>The mismatched jewels are actually pretty common on these second gen pens. If it has a black section it&#8217;ll most likely have a black blind cap jewel. The first gen pens with the section made from celluloid should have matching jewels. </p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reginald golding</title>
		<link>http://bwh.me/blog/2010/01/20/mmmm-vacumatic/comment-page-1/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>reginald golding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwh.me/blog/?p=480#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing! I&#039;m in love with the Vacs too, but only have  a couple. Good shape on the clip diamond too, yay.
It&#039;s my understanding that it&#039;s not terribly uncommon to see pens that have had bits replaced over time; maybe explains the mismatched jewels?
Some that knows more than me may be able to say for certain; but I&#039;m assuming that the blind cap had a striped jewel to start with, which was broken or otherwise lost, then replaced with what I presume to be a more readily available black jewel.
Either way, great find for the money! I&#039;m jealous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing! I&#8217;m in love with the Vacs too, but only have  a couple. Good shape on the clip diamond too, yay.<br />
It&#8217;s my understanding that it&#8217;s not terribly uncommon to see pens that have had bits replaced over time; maybe explains the mismatched jewels?<br />
Some that knows more than me may be able to say for certain; but I&#8217;m assuming that the blind cap had a striped jewel to start with, which was broken or otherwise lost, then replaced with what I presume to be a more readily available black jewel.<br />
Either way, great find for the money! I&#8217;m jealous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
